Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Never Been to Texas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 11:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never Been to Texas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article originally claimed that this single got to number 1 in Ireland and number 10 in the UK, but both are demonstrably false per The Irish Recorded Music Association (you will need to enter "Power of Dreams" in the artist field and hit the search button) and The Official Chart Company respectively. Removing those fake claims, we are left with a non-charting (and therefore non-notable) single. No content whatsoever worth merging to the band's article. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, clearly. Soupy sautoy (talk) 10:11, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom's points. Tarheel95 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too short to bother with merge. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 15:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 15:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per A9 (as tagged). There is no indication, why this single is notable. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 22:26, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: A9 does not apply in this case because the artist's article exists. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 01:53, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per WP:NSONGS. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 01:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Power of Dreams as article fails notability criteria for songs. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 02:20, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.